The Power Of… Discipline (Build Discipline)

Dear readers, I’ve been thinking about the power of love a lot this past week!

If you’ve ever been witness to the wonder that is the Back To The Future trilogy at any point in your life, you’ll know the song I’m thinking of and the incredibly strong association it has with the original Back To The Future soundtrack, but also with the whole franchise as well.

If you haven’t seen the movies, I’ll just leave this here for your convenience.

If you have seen the movies before, now the song is stuck in your head too! Ha.

Man, I must have have some sort of strange fascination with movie franchises if I keep bringing them up? I think it probably has to do with the fact that the story arc in a film is often fleshed out a little better then in a TV episode. That and it is usually self-contained and more consideration goes into the writing.

JK. Or am I?

But I have not JUST been thinking about the power of love. That song/concept was not the only part of the movies that came to mind for me when I kept hearing over and over again from friends and media content that the future was now here – that the October 21, 2015 date which Doc Brown and Marty were headed to in Back To The Future Part II, was finally on our doorstep.

back-to-the-future-ii-1

No, I had been thinking about a lot of the principles that the Back To The Future movies rely on to tell it’s story. Concepts of destiny, free will and the time-space continuum. And yes, also the power of love.

One of the major themes from the films interestingly enough is about society and how it changes over time.

This is best embodied in the relationship of Vice Principal Stickland and his family tree, versus the changing landscape of Hill Valley as the characters time hop through it. There are a ton of themes in the movies, but the Stricklands specifically are archetypes of morality and discipline. The Strickland of 1985 even has a favourite word to describe those who don’t uphold his version of etiquette. Slacker!

Admittedly this post is not about the movie Back To The Future, it’s just a device I’m using to get to the topic at hand. Discipline.

It’s funny to me how subjective a disciplined lifestyle can be from one individual to the next, but what I’ve always noticed about someone who is disciplined is that regardless of how they achieve their goals, they work out some sort of routine for themselves in order to accomplish their goals. Much like how fiction writers come to use techniques over and over again in order to create their stories.

I kind of hinted at this concept of discipline this past Wednesday, so if you don’t know what I am getting at, maybe do a rewind to a couple of posts ago and rejoin me when you are ready.

52b577721cb279f307df3206ef80b13d

Glad everyone is going the same direction now…

Why am I writing about the concept of discipline and such? Well, I think Marty McFly has some issues with discipline in those movies, fears of rejection regarding his music in particular, and yeah he definitely grows up towards the end, but we are all in various states of disorganization at one time or another in our lives, but we don’t necessarily need to experience a traumatic event to shift positively.

So how do we work on this?

Well, a lot of people much smarter than I, have suggested that when we form good habits and have schedules, we can spend our brain power on increasingly interesting ideas and actions that propel us forward, rather than rebuilding the wheel, so to speak, every time we engage in an activity.

Let me give you a more concrete example to put it into perspective.

If you decide you want to get better at public speaking, you attend a public speaking course, get involved with toastmasters, start reading book, play brain training exercises, try your hand at improv, etc, etc. But in order to actually improve at those attributes, you do them regularly and allow the habits to form naturally as you commit to the practice of showing up.

Achieving results with creative endeavours is no different – if there are things you need to do in order to create works of fiction, illustrate comic books or piece together your next dress design, and those recurring tasks constantly come up, then you have to generate the brain power to remember to do those tasks.

But if you build a routine for yourself, you will eventually “know” what you need to do intuitively, and can focus your energy on experimenting, playing, and enjoying your talents.

Without building a routine for you, I’m going to share a link here to another article I enjoyed that’s done some of the legwork already and which also has citations.

What do you think of this theory? Are routines important? Do you like it better when you let your brain run on auto pilot and move you into the studio or at your desk where you can focus on the fun parts? Leave me some comments!

Tim!

It’s What I Sit On, But I Don’t Take It With Me (Goldeneye review)

Hot off the heels of another incredible movie franchise review (AKA Avengers: Age of Ultron)… another blog post about a film in a legacy, but I promise you that it’ll be okay. You’ll probably even like this review.

Almost 20 years ago today, because it was released in theatres on November 17th, so I’m off by about a month, we were introduced to Eon Productions first non Ian Fleming based film.

The 17th spy film in the James Bond series. The one called…

Goldeneye (1995)
Cast: Pierce Brosnan, Sean Bean, Izabella Scorupco, Famke Janssen, Judi Dench
Director: Martin Campbell
re-released on blu-ray September 15, 2015 (The Pierce Brosnan Collection)
********* 9/10

007goldeneye

IMDB: 7.2
Rotten Tomatoes: 82%, Audience Score 83%
The Guardian: n/a (good recap here)

Martin Campbell has a pretty good rap sheet. He’s directed some excellent films, including The Mask of Zorro, Casino Royale, and Edge of Darkness. Let’s ignore Green Lantern please.

Keep in mind all of these films came out after his first 007 film. Fun fact, the movies Campbell directed before Goldeneye came in groups of three. Three movies about the legal system, and before that, three movies which were essentially softcore porn, IMHO.

So how did the dude land this script?

That’s something for people who have a lot more time on their hands than me to figure out. All I know is that Eon Productions made the right decision.

The film starts on a Soviet Union base during the Cold War. James Bond (Pierce Brosnan) and another agent, Alec Trevelyan (Sean Bean), are on track to blow up a chemical weapons factory when Alec is captured by General Ourumov (Gottfried John), who expects Bond to give up. Bond resets the timers from six minutes to three and walks out to surrender, just in time to see Trevelyan executed. Bond is able to escape via a conveyor belt and once outside the facility, using a motorcycle, leaps off a cliff after a plane. Miraculously he escapes as the weapons plant explodes.

Fast forward nine years, Bond is driving in the mountains near Monaco with a MI6 psychiatrist who is evaluating his mental state. During this time an impromptu race happens between Bond and Xenia Onatopp (Famke Janssen), thankfully he quits when the psychiatrist gets upset.

Cue Bond on assignment to observe if the Janus crime syndicate will be present at a demonstration for the Eurocopter Tiger, which is unaffected by electromagnetic pulses from nuclear weapons. Xenia shows up a second time and uses her sexual prowess to steal an admiral’s ID, but not before killing him with her thighs. Xenia and accomplice then steal the Tiger during the demonstration.

Later, in Severnaya, Siberia, General Ourumov and Xenia arrive in the Tiger helicopter at a communications outpost. Ourumov takes control of the “Goldeneye” from the officer in charge, and promptly has the team executed by Xenia. He then activates the satellite, which delivers an nuclear powered EMP blast to Severnaya. The pair escape in the Tiger, as it is unaffected by the EMP.

One of the technicians, Natalya Simonova (Izabella Scorupco), manages to survive the destruction of the command center, and climbs out of the base in search of rescue. At MI6, the observation room watches the whole event, including Bond, who spots Natalya crawling away from the base. He reports this to, M (Judi Dench). They have a nice exchange, where M calls Bond a misogynist dinosaur and relic from the Cold War, and gives him instructions to investigate Janus, Goldeneye, and Ourumov in greater detail while in Russia, but not to make it about revenge.

And that’s all I am going to share with you for now. Not because of spoilers, because you can read a summary in a bunch of different places on the internet. As I mentioned the movie is almost 20 years old.

Pros: The technology is up-to-date (for the time period), Alan Cumming is hilarious as a seedy Russian hacker, the villain Janus is incredibly well done, and Brosnan has the right combination of wit and strength.

Cons: There is a bit of a formula to every 007 film, so it’s not too difficult to see where the plot is headed, and you’ll expect to see innuendo between Bond and Moneypenny or a battle of remarks with Q

Runtime: 130 minutes

Points of Interest: Having played the crap out of the N64 game after I watched this movie, I probably spent 100s of hours on it to be honest, it’s fun to go back and relive the “levels”, knowing how it will all lead to that final battle atop of “The Cradle” at Janus’ secret lair in the Congo. Also it was the first move to be released on DVD, crazy right? Lastly, Goldeneye is the nickname of Ian Fleming’s beachfront house in Jamaica where he wrote about the Bond universe.

And that is my third movie review. I hope you enjoyed my post! I look forward to hearing your feedback. Leave some comments and questions.

Out of theories for now, check back soon!

Tim!

Not Just Another Sequel (Avengers: Age of Ultron review)

Do you like to watch epic movie universes? I know I personally do. My all-time favourite cinematic universe is The Fast and The Furious, but there are lots of others that do a fantastic job.

Today I have a great universe to share with you, one that is constantly improving upon its ethos and pulling us further in so that we can enjoy and relate to its characters.

That’s right I am referring to the Marvel comics we all know and most of us are starting to love. I’ve written about the power of superheroes in previous posts and this review details them outright…

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)
Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner, with James Spader, and Samuel L. Jackson
Director: Joss Whedon
released on blu-ray October 2, 2015
********* 9/10

Avengers-Age-of-Ultron-Poster

IMDB: 7.7
Rotten Tomatoes: 74%, Audience Score 86%
The Guardian: ****/*****

Joss Whedon is getting to be a pretty big deal at this point in his career. With director/writer credits for The Avengers (and now Avengers: Age of Ultron), 2012’s Much Ado About Nothing, and Serenity, not to mention writing credits for Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Toy Story, Atlantis: The Lost Empire, Firefly, Angel, the Astonishing X-Men TV series, and The Cabin in the Woods, Whedon has shown he can tell a story.

But was Avengers: Age of Ultron a good movie?

With so many high ranking actors in this movie and a writer like Whedon at the helm, I would argue a big yes. I have no major issues with the visual, the story or the relationships as they develop, and the set ups for future Marvel films are enjoyable as per audience expectations at this point.

Much like the first film, we are treated to a few location hops throughout the story (read: New York City, Seoul, and Wakanda), but the plot mainly focuses on the made up nation of Sokovia.

The movie begins with a raid by the Avengers – Tony Stark / Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr), Steve Rogers / Captain America (Chris Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Bruce Banner / Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), and Clint Barton / Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) – on a secret HYDRA base which has been conducting experiments on Sokovians. They are using the sceptre previously wielded by Loki to accomplish this.

Enter the only two surviving enhanced – Pietro (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen). Rogers finally captures Baron von Strucker, the head of the base, while Stark retrieves the sceptre. But only after Wanda uses her hex powers to implant a fear-filled vision of future end-game scenario that sees the world conquered and The Avengers defeated, save Iron-Man.

When the team arrives back at Avengers Tower the group plans a party while Tony coerces Bruce into helping him use the sceptre to design the AI needed to create the Ultron defence system he has in mind for the world.  The AI program finally takes while the whole team is out celebrating at the party.

What happens next is pretty wild as Ultron (James Spader) comes to life, and decides it is his sole responsibility to not only take care of the Earth, but that he will need to get rid of the Avengers and force humanity to evolve at the same time. JARVIS (Paul Bettany) is the first casualty in this process.

In a creepy rendition of “I’ve Got No Strings” we get to see Ultron embed himself into one of the drones Stark has been using as of late, then he surprise attacks the Avengers in their home base, and then leaves with the sceptre to create a better body and his own army.

I can’t tell you too much more without giving away the rest of the plot, but it gets even better from there.

Pros: The jokes are infinitely better, and the more of the movies you watch, and more of a fan of the comics you are, the more you will be rewarded as watch. In particular, the exchange with Hawkeye and Pietro towards the end of the film where Clint makes a joke, and also the fact that Ultron’s personality mirrors Tony’s in very funny ways.

Cons: There is a very unnatural death at the end of movie which I didn’t really care for, and which apparently was intentionally done as an F U to another distributor. It felt forced and didn’t really hold me, but you’ll have to watch to see what I mean.

Points of Interest: Seeing the nation of Wakanda, if only for a brief moment, the Hulk buster armour, the tension between Bruce and Natasha, and the unveiling of the new team at the end of the movie were pretty cool moments

Runtime: 141 minutes

New comer Elizabeth Olsen is worth the price of admission alone as her portrayal of the Scarlett Witch was very on point, though admittedly we never hear her superhero name? If you haven’t watched the first Avengers movie, you can probably get by without seeing it, but you are definitely doing yourself a disservice. So do yourself a favour and watch that one first. But I bet you dollars to donuts, you’ll want to see the rest of the Marvel cinematic universe if haven’t yet.

Avengers Assemble!

It really is hard not to enjoy these stories because there are so many archetypes explored and something there for everyone to relate to. Maybe you disagree? Either way, leave your questions and comments. You could even suggest a review for an upcoming week.

Well, I hope you enjoyed this review, because I’m spent for the day. I can only handle so many theories at a given time.

Tim!